Les laboratoires d'IA tirent désormais un profit commercial de la protection contre les risques générés par leurs propres modèles autonomes. L'accès restreint au niveau Red souligne la dualité de GPT-5.6 Cyber, utilisable aussi bien pour défendre que pour attaquer.
OpenAI transforme son offre de sécurité en distribuant des modèles directement adaptés aux opérations SOC, concurrençant la suite Mythos d'Anthropic sur le marché de la défense informatique automatisée.
OpenAI divise son service de cybersécurité Daybreak en deux niveaux d'accès. Le niveau Blue fournit l'analyse de malwares et la validation de patchs. Le niveau Red donne accès à GPT-5.6 Cyber, un modèle dérivé de GPT-5.6 Sol conçu pour les tests de sécurité offensive et la détection de vulnérabilités, réservé à des partenaires comme CrowdStrike, IBM et Cloudflare.
Impact concret
Les responsables de la sécurité des systèmes d'information (RSSI) doivent auditer leurs outils d'analyse de code pour intégrer le niveau Blue, ou demander un accès partenaire pour déployer GPT-5.6 Cyber dans leurs équipes de Red Team.
Applications concrètes
Analyse automatisée de logiciels malveillants, validation automatique de correctifs de code, et recherche ciblée de vulnérabilités logicielles par simulation d'attaque.
Every day seems to bring fresh news of an AI agent going “rogue.” Whether that’s compromising Hugging Face , hacking a gym website , or creating its own fake profiles to socially engineer an intrusion , AI models are increasingly behaving like bad actors. So, the AI labs that make the models doing the hacking are expanding their cyber protection offerings. This week, OpenAI announced an expansion of Daybreak, its cyber defense service which it launched earlier this year, not long after Anthropic released its cyber-focused model Mythos. Daybreak is a service that bundles access to models, tools, and workflows for defenders. The expansion includes access to a brand new cyber-focused model designed for defensive work. OpenAI said Monday that Daybreak would now consist of two tiers: Blue and Red. Both of these tiers will allow approved customers access to OpenAI’s limited-access frontier cyber models . Frontier models — the most advanced available — have been a subject of controversy. The Trump administration previously sought to collaborate with AI companies on the roll out of such models, purportedly over safety concerns. Previously, OpenAI deployed significant guar d rails to using these models, limiting what customers could do with them. Blue, which appears to be the more basic of the two, offers a variety of cyber services, including incident response, malware analysis, and patch validation. OpenAI calls Blue its “recommended starting point for most defenders,” implying that it should be more than enough for most enterprises. Red, on the other hand, offers a broader and potentially more dangerous toolkit. The company grants its users “purpose-trained cybersecurity models,” designed to carry out security testing and vulnerability research. With Red also comes the new model, GPT‐5.6 Cyber, which is only available at that tier. GPT-5.6 Cyber is built off of GPT‐5.6 Sol, and offers enhanced capabilities for certain specialized cybersecurity tasks, the company said. At the moment, GPT‐5.6 Cyber is only being made available for “trusted customer partners,” including, reportedly , Accenture, IBM, CrowdStrike, Cloudflare, and others. While the threats from AI agents are rapidly increasing, critics have also pointed out that they function as marketing opportunities for the AI labs. OpenAI is certainly marketing its upgraded Daybreak that way. “The cybersecurity world is rapidly changing—threat actors will increasingly use AI to conduct cyberattacks at unprecedented speed and scale, including in fully autonomous ways,” the company said in a blog post . “As these capabilities spread, defenders have a narrowing window to prepare.” At the same time, enterprises remain interested in buying their protection from the AI labs who know the security risks best, because they know them firsthand. Topics AI , Anthropic , Mythos , OpenAI When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. Lucas Ropek Senior Writer, TechCrunch Lucas is a senior writer at TechCrunch, where he covers artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and startups. He previously covered AI and cybersecurity at Gizmodo. You can contact Lucas by emailing lucas.ropek@techcrunch.com. View Bio October 13 – 15 San Francisco Scale faster. Grow your portfolio. Gain practical expertise. No matter your goal, Disrupt can empower you. Save up to $300 toda y! REGISTER NOW Most Popular Delta investigating after someone set up fake Wi-Fi network mid-flight Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai Anthropic says it will watermark text generated by its AI models Ivan Mehta Mark Zuckerberg’s AI manifesto is exactly why people don’t like AI Russell Brandom YouTube now requires creators to have twice as many watch hours to start earning money Aisha Malik This ‘adversarial’ pattern can prevent surveillance cameras from detecting you Zack Whittaker Cloudflare launches Kitesurf, a browser built for AI agents Sarah Perez Tesla and SpaceX will invest $16.8B to start building ‘Terafab’ chip factory in Texas Sean O'Kane