Une décision capitale pour le secteur qui clarifie les limites du pouvoir exécutif face aux clauses d'utilisation responsables des fournisseurs de modèles.
Cette décision fixe un précédent juridique majeur en empêchant le gouvernement américain d'utiliser le prétexte de la sécurité nationale pour sanctionner les éditeurs d'IA refusant d'adapter leurs clauses éthiques aux exigences militaires.
La juge Rita Lin a statué que la décision du secrétaire à la Défense d'interdire aux agences fédérales d'utiliser Claude constituait une sanction arbitraire visant à punir Anthropic. Ce conflit faisait suite au refus de l'entreprise de supprimer ses garde-fous éthiques restreignant l'usage de ses modèles pour les armes autonomes et la surveillance de masse. La magistrate a souligné l'absence de preuves sécuritaires et la contradiction avec la poursuite simultanée d'autres collaborations militaires avec l'entreprise.
Impact concret
Les responsables juridiques et dirigeants d'entreprises Tech disposent d'un soutien judiciaire pour maintenir leurs conditions d'utilisation éthiques sans craindre une exclusion arbitraire des marchés publics.
Applications concrètes
Maintien des garde-fous de sécurité sur les modèles d'IA déployés dans le secteur public et poursuite du partenariat d'Anthropic avec le gouvernement sur le modèle Mythos pour la cybersécurité.
A federal judge in California ruled on Thursday evening that the Trump administration’s designation of Anthropic as a supply-chain risk was illegal. U.S. District Judge Rita Lin said in her ruling that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s labeling of Anthropic as a risk to national security signified “unlawful retaliation” in violation of the First Amendment, and said the decision was “arbitrary and capricious.” Lin also said Anthropic was denied due process, as required under the Fifth Amendment. Earlier this year, Hegseth and President Donald Trump labeled Anthropic a supply-chain risk and ordered all federal agencies, even those outside of defense, to stop working with the Claude maker. The dispute stemmed from Anthropic setting hard lines on certain safety guardrails that would allow the Pentagon to use its models for fully autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of American citizens. The Pentagon denied that it would use Anthropic models for anything but lawful purposes, and alleged that Anthropic could try to control the military’s use of the models it bought and paid for. In her ruling, Lin said that the government’s “words and deeds confirm that the challenged actions were based on a desire to make a public example out of Anthropic for its ‘arrogance’ in criticizing the government.” She pointed out the disconnect between the supply-chain label and other actions from the government, like Hegseth’s proposition to apply the Defense Production Act to Anthropic, “which would mean the company was essential to national security rather than a threat to it.” She also pointed to the Department of Defense continuing to pursue a contract with the company, and the government collaborating with the company’s new model, Mythos, for cybersecurity. Lin also said it’s clear that Anthropic “undisputedly lacks” any backdoor access to its technology once it hands it over to the DOD. “Though the Department of War is undisputedly free to select the AI vendor of its choice, the evidence demonstrates that the broad measures imposed on Anthropic were illegal and baseless,” Lin wrote. “The empty invocation of national security is not a blank check to punish and retaliate against government critics,” she added. “We welcome the court’s ruling that this supply chain risk designation was unlawful,” an Anthropic spokesperson said in a statement shared with TechCrunch. “We remain focused on working productively with the government to harness AI for our national security so all Americans benefit from this technology.” Anthropic filed two complaints against the DOD in March in California and Washington, D.C. The D.C. suit is still ongoing. TechCrunch has reached out to the DOD for comment. Topics AI , Anthropic , dod , Government & Policy , pete hegseth , supply chain risk When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. Rebecca Bellan Senior Reporter Rebecca Bellan is a senior reporter at TechCrunch where she covers the business, policy, and emerging trends shaping artificial intelligence. Her work has also appeared in Forbes, Bloomberg, The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, and other publications. You can contact or verify outreach from Rebecca by emailing rebecca.bellan@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at rebeccabellan.491 on Signal. View Bio October 13 – 15 San Francisco Don’t miss out . The startup community will gather to answer a pivotal question: How do you build sustainably in the AI era? REGISTER NOW Most Popular Nvidia’s AI advantage is moving beyond the GPU Russell Brandom OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and 100 other companies call for action to defend against rogue AI Lucas Ropek Hugging Face is selling a cute $399 open source duck robot, Microduck Rebecca Bellan Nvidia closes in on Hugging Face acquisition Connie Loizos Viral AI startup Instinct has raised $350M at a $2.5B valuation Lucas Ropek Fitbit founders launch Luffu Link, an LTE health and safety band Aisha Malik India’s Airbound bags $37M to take on trucks with rocket-like drones Jagmeet Singh